Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Flat Base Bullets for .308

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    154

    Default Flat Base Bullets for .308

    Every few months there's a "Sharp Shooter Shootout" match at Clark Rifle. It's a 100 yard competition, I've shot it twice now with with my Savage .308 using 168g SMK's. I'm sub-MOA with the 168g SMK, but I've heard that a lighter flat based bullet is theoretically superior for 100 yard shots.

    So... Can anyone recommend a good match grade flat based .308 bullet? The Berger Match Target FB look intriguing. I'm contemplating trying the 135g or 150g, but for ~$50 per 100 I want to make sure i know what I'm doing before buying some. Any advice and direction is appreciated.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    96

    Default

    I used to shoot service rifle at 200yds. Generally speaking, since the 10 ring & x ring are pretty large, most folks shoot 150gr psp/fmj/surplus vs. spending the extra cash on 168gr match HP. With the $$$ they've saved, they spend it on components to make more ammo to practice with (offhand, sitting, etc).... the point being, rather than spend the extra cash on components to give them a slight edge, they are spending it on practice to develop their form & reinforce the good habits (npoa/breath/trigger squeeze).

    How accurate do you have to be in this competition? is it a benchrest competition? I've heard of a lot of folks trying 125gr bullets for short range ammo... no specific recommendations.

    The flip side of this... if you've found a good load, its relatively inexpensive, and you know exactly where it hits... why change?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    NW Quadrant WA State
    Posts
    1,334

    Default

    In theory the flat based is good for short ranges mostly because the BT's take longer to stabilize. Whether this is true or not I haven't tested for my rifle. I get great performance out of std BT's at 100 yards and excellent performance at 200 yards.

    You're last sentence pretty much sums it up. If what you are using is doing the job, searching for something marginally cheaper may well eat up any savings in the workup of the load and subsequent practice in learning what it does.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deadshot2 View Post
    In theory the flat based is good for short ranges mostly because the BT's take longer to stabilize.
    I am no expert on the subject, but I have heard hot loads also take more distance to stabilize... makes sense to me if both were true.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    NW Quadrant WA State
    Posts
    1,334

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rrojohnso View Post
    I am no expert on the subject, but I have heard hot loads also take more distance to stabilize... makes sense to me if both were true.
    I too have heard this. What I'm beginning to believe is the entire art of shooting involves as much "Witchcraft" as "Science". Luck sometimes helps too.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    154

    Default

    I very much agree with the whole witchcraft comment. I'm finding that time behind the trigger is more beneficial than excess time spent loading.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KTM530XCW View Post
    time behind the trigger...
    ... That's the key. It's all about trigger time - and none of us get enough!

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Salem, Or
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KTM530XCW View Post
    Every few months there's a "Sharp Shooter Shootout" match at Clark Rifle. It's a 100 yard competition, I've shot it twice now with with my Savage .308 using 168g SMK's. I'm sub-MOA with the 168g SMK, but I've heard that a lighter flat based bullet is theoretically superior for 100 yard shots.

    So... Can anyone recommend a good match grade flat based .308 bullet? The Berger Match Target FB look intriguing. I'm contemplating trying the 135g or 150g, but for ~$50 per 100 I want to make sure i know what I'm doing before buying some. Any advice and direction is appreciated.
    Maybe I can help here with some info, flat base bullets(pills) fired on the short line can be very accurate thats why the bench rest shooters use them, there flat base also helps slow down barrel errosion.

    I'm a Service Rifle shooter and use this load in a M1a on the short line(200yds) offhand and sitting rapids when I do my part they will more than hold the 10ring, for 100yds they should work very well.

    You didn't say what brass you reload, I use military brass for there thicker construction I will assume that you use commercial brass Federal or Winchester so you will need too add about 1 grn of powder too the charges.

    Resize and trim brass too 2.005in
    Prime with any std large rifle primer you like
    Powder 41.5 IMR or H-4895 or 41.0 Varget
    Bullet Speer 125 TnT
    COAL- 2.70
    Keep the M/V under 3000fps so the bullet holds together, the old Speer box had a M/V warnning and I don't know how fast you can push the new 125's at. I don't know what your barrel lenth is but out of a 22in M1a my rifle runs about 2800fps. Recoil is about the same as a Ar/15.

    If there is alot of wind the 135 Sierra HPBT(COAL 2.75) with the same load data is a aussum performer and they don't have any speed limit to worry about just load and go.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    oregon
    Posts
    139

    Default

    the savage unless you changed the barrel is a 1:10 twist which is pretty much optimized for a bullet that weights around 168grs(theoredically). some people have had good success with 155 secnars.

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Salem, Or
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chowser2 View Post
    the savage unless you changed the barrel is a 1:10 twist which is pretty much optimized for a bullet that weights around 168grs(theoredically). some people have had good success with 155 secnars.

    A 1/10 twist is very flexable for bullet weights in a range from 125grs to 210grs, the 125 Tnt has the same nose profile as the Sierra 168 thats why they work so good, another reason for the 125 is cost there cheaper to shoot, why shoot expensive bullets at 100yds when a cheap bullet thats just as accurate on the short line gets the job done?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •